ATI Radeon IGP 350M vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS
Radeon IGP 320M Radeon IGP 330M Radeon IGP 340M Radeon IGP 345M Radeon IGP 350M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 with Radeon IGP 350M, including specs and performance data.

GTS 450 Rev. 2
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 106 Watt
4.41
+21950%

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms ATI IGP 350M by a whopping 21950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
ATI IGP 350M IGP 350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6661496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.90no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGF116RS200
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed783 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Wattno data
Texture fill rate25.060.37
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed902 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.73 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.41 0.02
Recency 15 March 2011 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

GTS 450 Rev. 2 has a 21950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
ATI IGP 350M Radeon IGP 350M
vs
FX Go 5200 GeForce FX Go 5200
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9700 PRO Radeon 9700 PRO
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 7500 Radeon 7500
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
R7 M270DX Radeon R7 M270DX
ATI HD 5470 Radeon HD 5470
vs
9300 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
ATI HD 5450 Radeon HD 5450
vs
9300 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
9300 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
vs
E9171 MCM Radeon E9171 MCM
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
vs
GTX 460 X2 GeForce GTX 460 X2
GTX 460 X2 GeForce GTX 460 X2
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 9 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.