GeForce MX450 vs GTS 250M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 250M and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 250M
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 28 Watt
1.44

MX450 outperforms GTS 250M by a whopping 573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking998460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.5326.57
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT215N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96896
Core clock speed500 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors727 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate16.00100.8
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs832
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVINo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 250M 1.44
GeForce MX450 9.69
+573%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 250M 553
GeForce MX450 3734
+575%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTS 250M 3659
GeForce MX450 22831
+524%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−3.6%
29
+3.6%
1440p2−3
−800%
18
+800%
4K4−5
−650%
30
+650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−700%
32
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−450%
22
+450%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Hitman 3 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−185%
94
+185%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Hitman 3 6−7
−383%
29
+383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−400%
40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−170%
89
+170%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Hitman 3 6−7
−317%
25
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−60%
24
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−275%
30
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−81.8%
20
+81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+371%
7
−371%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 10−11
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−550%
26
+550%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10
+0%
10
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
+0%
6
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+0%
11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+0%
18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTS 250M and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX450 is 800% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX450 is 650% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTS 250M is 371% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 2150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTS 250M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GeForce MX450 is ahead in 48 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 9.69
Recency 15 June 2009 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 572.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 250M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
GeForce GTS 250M
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 250M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1322 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.