GeForce RTX 4090 vs GTS 150M

Place in the ranking	1031	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	6
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.83
Power efficiency	2.00	15.23
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G94	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 March 2009 (15 years ago)	20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	16384
Core clock speed	400 MHz	2235 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	505 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	450 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.80	1,290
Floating-point processing power	0.128 TFLOPS	82.58 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	192	no data
ROPs	16	176
TMUs	32	512
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin
SLI options	2-way	-
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 800 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	1.01 TB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.8
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 150M 1.31

RTX 4090 100.00
+7534%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 150M 504

RTX 4090 38533
+7545%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −8533%	259 +8533%
1440p	2−3 −9900%	200 +9900%
4K	1−2 −14200%	143 +14200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	6.17
1440p	no data	8.00
4K	no data	11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−5525%

225
+5525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −3817%	235 +3817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −5450%	222 +5450%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −6600%	200−210 +6600%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −14450%	290−300 +14450%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2414%	350−400 +2414%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6100%	120−130 +6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −5675%	450−500 +5675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −367%	150−160 +367%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −3283%	200−210 +3283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −5250%	214 +5250%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −6600%	200−210 +6600%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −14450%	290−300 +14450%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2414%	350−400 +2414%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6100%	120−130 +6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −6750%	548 +6750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −2091%	240−250 +2091%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −367%	150−160 +367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −2883%	179 +2883%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −5150%	210 +5150%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −14450%	290−300 +14450%
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −2714%	394 +2714%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −6663%	541 +6663%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −2673%	305 +2673%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −364%	153 +364%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−6100%

120−130
+6100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −16500%	160−170 +16500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −5500%	110−120 +5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −15400%	155 +15400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	80−85
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −15300%	154 +15300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −8300%	80−85 +8300%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1871%	130−140 +1871%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −7660%	388 +7660%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −26700%	268 +26700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −3900%	240−250 +3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−3125%

120−130
+3125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −11900%	120 +11900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −11900%	120 +11900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	0−1	50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−3600%

110−120
+3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	287 +0%	287 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	248 +0%	248 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

220

+0%

220

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	183 +0%	183 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	152 +0%	152 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	504 +0%	504 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Hitman 3	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	105 +0%	105 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	281 +0%	281 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	80 +0%	80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	282 +0%	282 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	117 +0%	117 +0%

This is how GTS 150M and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 is 8533% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 is 9900% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 is 14200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4090 is 26700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4090 is ahead in 48 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.31	100.00
Recency	3 March 2009	20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	450 Watt

GTS 150M has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 7533.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 150M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 150M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.