Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 755M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 2 Watt
8.72
+16.7%

GT 755M SLI outperforms Vega 7 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494532
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiency5.9811.38
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN14P-?Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768448
Core clock speed980 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data53.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.702 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M SLI 8.72
+16.7%
Vega 7 7.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 755M SLI 5673
+8.1%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 755M SLI 4106
+22.7%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 755M SLI 28792
+16.4%
Vega 7 24726

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
+72.7%
22
−72.7%
1440p35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
4K18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how GT 755M SLI and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M SLI is 73% faster in 1080p
  • GT 755M SLI is 9% faster in 1440p
  • GT 755M SLI is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.72 7.47
Recency 1 November 2013 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 45 Watt

GT 755M SLI has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 2150% lower power consumption.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2095 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.