Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 755M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.40

Vega 7 outperforms GT 755M by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking670533
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Power efficiency6.0611.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384448
Core clock speed980 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate31.3653.20
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1350 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M 4.40
Vega 7 7.48
+70%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 755M 2801
Vega 7 5249
+87.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 755M 2106
Vega 7 3348
+59%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 755M 14967
Vega 7 24726
+65.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Full HD22
−4.5%
23
+4.5%
1440p14−16
−78.6%
25
+78.6%
4K8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Elden Ring 10−11
−40%
14
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−52.6%
29
+52.6%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−110%
21
+110%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−92.9%
27
+92.9%
Valorant 9−10
−222%
29
+222%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Dota 2 14−16
−21.4%
17
+21.4%
Elden Ring 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−27.3%
28
+27.3%
Fortnite 24−27
−69.2%
40−45
+69.2%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24
+26.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−50%
15
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−21.1%
46
+21.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Valorant 9−10
−55.6%
14
+55.6%
World of Tanks 70−75
+25.9%
58
−25.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Dota 2 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−10.5%
21
+10.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Valorant 9−10
−178%
25
+178%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Elden Ring 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
World of Tanks 30−35
−74.2%
50−55
+74.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Valorant 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Elden Ring 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Valorant 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GT 755M and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 70% faster in 900p
  • Vega 7 is 5% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 79% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 88% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 755M is 26% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Vega 7 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 755M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Vega 7 is ahead in 46 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 7.48
Recency 25 June 2013 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has a 70% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 78 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2291 vote

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.