Quadro K1100M vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

Place in the ranking	557	796
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	1.06
Power efficiency	no data	4.31
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	N14P-GT	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$109.94

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	967 MHz	706 MHz
Number of transistors	1300 Million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	22.59
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.5422 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 - 5000 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	44.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	+
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 750M SLI 6.92
+145%

K1100M 2.83

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 750M SLI 4634
+154%

K1100M 1827

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 750M SLI 16142
+79.5%

K1100M 8992

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 750M SLI 3703
+176%

K1100M 1341

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 750M SLI 23491
+155%

K1100M 9228

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GT 750M SLI 44
+153%

K1100M 18

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

54
+218%

−218%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

6.47

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12
+120%

5−6

−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Battlefield 5	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +200%	14−16 −200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +39.5%	35−40 −39.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Battlefield 5	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +200%	14−16 −200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −9.5%	23 +9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +39.5%	35−40 −39.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +200%	14−16 −200%
Hitman 3	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +86.4%	21−24 −86.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +425%	4 −425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +39.5%	35−40 −39.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+171%

7−8

−171%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Hitman 3	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +159%	16−18 −159%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+100%

6−7

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+75%

4−5

−75%

This is how GT 750M SLI and K1100M compete in popular games:

GT 750M SLI is 218% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 750M SLI is 800% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the K1100M is 10% faster.

All in all, in popular games: