Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 750M SLI with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.

GT 750M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB DDR3, GDDR5
6.91
+23.8%

GT 750M SLI outperforms R7 350 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.32
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameN14P-GTCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)6 July 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768512
Core clock speed967 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1300 Million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 - 5000 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
+30%
40−45
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

This is how GT 750M SLI and R7 350 compete in popular games:

  • GT 750M SLI is 30% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.91 5.58
Recency 1 April 2013 6 July 2016

GT 750M SLI has a 23.8% higher aggregate performance score.

R7 350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce GT 750M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 750M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
GeForce GT 750M SLI
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce GT 750M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 474 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.