Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs GeForce GT 635M

Place in the ranking	994	305
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.85	30.78
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GF116	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	Up to 144	1024
Core clock speed	Up to 675 MHz	1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	753 MHz	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.20	103.7
Floating-point processing power	0.3888 TFLOPS	3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	24	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	Up to 192bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 43.2 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 635M 1.45

T2000 Max-Q 17.90
+1134%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 635M 558

T2000 Max-Q 6899
+1136%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 635M 1110

T2000 Max-Q 11461
+933%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 635M 4995

T2000 Max-Q 39269
+686%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 635M 750

T2000 Max-Q 8262
+1002%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24 −142%	58 +142%
1440p	2−3 −1200%	26 +1200%
4K	3−4 −1433%	46 +1433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−600%

27−30
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −783%	53 +783%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −800%	35−40 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1500%	45−50 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2725%	110−120 +2725%
Hitman 3	6−7 −467%	30−35 +467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −487%	85−90 +487%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −3100%	64 +3100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −638%	55−60 +638%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −161%	85−90 +161%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −800%	35−40 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1500%	45−50 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2725%	110−120 +2725%
Hitman 3	6−7 −467%	30−35 +467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −487%	85−90 +487%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −638%	55−60 +638%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −273%	40−45 +273%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −161%	85−90 +161%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −317%	25 +317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −800%	35−40 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2725%	110−120 +2725%
Hitman 3	6−7 −467%	30−35 +467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −267%	55 +267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −638%	55−60 +638%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −200%	33 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −161%	85−90 +161%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2250%

47
+2250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	20−22
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Hitman 3	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −620%	35−40 +620%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −1429%	100−110 +1429%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−625%

27−30
+625%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1200%

12−14
+1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	9−10
Far Cry 5	0−1	10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−433%

16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	86 +0%	86 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Metro Exodus	69 +0%	69 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

30−33

+0%

30−33

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how GT 635M and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T2000 Max-Q is 142% faster in 1080p
T2000 Max-Q is 1200% faster in 1440p
T2000 Max-Q is 1433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Max-Q is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Max-Q is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.45	17.90
Recency	22 March 2012	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt

GT 635M has 14.3% lower power consumption.

T2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1134.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 635M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 635M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.