Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GT 520M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 520M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.74

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms GT 520M by a whopping 924% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1161528
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency4.2318.55
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGF108Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4880
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 520M 0.74
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.58
+924%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 520M 502
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332
+962%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 520M 2280
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+853%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p8
−900%
80−85
+900%
Full HD12
−58.3%
19
+58.3%
1200p7
−900%
70−75
+900%
1440p0−110
4K1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.00no data
4K59.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
13
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−220%
16
+220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−291%
40−45
+291%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 20−22
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−100%
62
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−200%
15
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−291%
40−45
+291%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 20−22
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−300%
24
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−58.1%
49
+58.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8
+167%
Hitman 3 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−45.5%
16
+45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 20−22

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 14−16
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 5−6

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 3−4

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+0%
19
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
+0%
16
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GT 520M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 900% faster in 900p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 58% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 900% faster in 1200p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 2250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 35 tests (54%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 7.58
Recency 5 January 2011 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 28 Watt

GT 520M has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has a 924.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 411 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 921 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.