GeForce MX570 vs GT 520M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520M and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 520M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.74

MX570 outperforms GT 520M by a whopping 1905% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1153350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency4.2841.22
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed600 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80073.92
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs440
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 520M 0.74
GeForce MX570 14.84
+1905%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 520M 284
GeForce MX570 5728
+1917%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p8
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Full HD12
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
1200p7
−1900%
140−150
+1900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−152%
75−80
+152%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−152%
75−80
+152%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−152%
75−80
+152%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 40−45

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 27−30
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 10−12

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GT 520M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 1900% faster in 900p
  • GeForce MX570 is 1900% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX570 is 1900% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 4450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 35 tests (54%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 14.84
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 25 Watt

GT 520M has 108.3% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 1905.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 406 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 92 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.