Quadro FX 1300 vs GeForce 9700M GTS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1165not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.84no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG94NV38
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)9 August 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed530 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors505 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate12.722.800
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops180no data
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s17.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9700M GTS 278
+718%
FX 1300 34

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 9 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 55 Watt

9700M GTS has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX 1300, on the other hand, has 9.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9700M GTS and Quadro FX 1300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9700M GTS is a notebook card while Quadro FX 1300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
GeForce 9700M GTS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9700M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.