Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs GeForce 9300M G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1378not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG86GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2008 (16 years ago)26 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed400 MHz1245 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1597 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200511.0
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS16.35 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s1,133 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2008 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 250 Watt

9300M G has 1823.1% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M G and Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook card while Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 14 votes

Rate Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.