ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce 9300M GS

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13611542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.34no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG98RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed550 MHz239 MHz
Number of transistors210 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4000.96
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s5.248 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M GS 106
+5200%
ATI 9200 PRO 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 28 Watt

9300M GS has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 130.8% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300M GS and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M GS is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Radeon 9200 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 164 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M GS or Radeon 9200 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.