GeForce RTX 5070 vs 8800M GTX SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with GeForce RTX 5070, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5070 outperforms 8800M GTX SLI by a whopping 3727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 891 | 11 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.09 | no data |
| Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | NB8E-GTX | GB205 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 November 2007 (17 years ago) | February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 6144 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 2165 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2510 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1508 Million | 31,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 481.9 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 30.84 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−3700%
|
190−200
+3700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−3650%
|
300−310
+3650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+62.5%
|
24−27
−62.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−3700%
|
190−200
+3700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+400%
|
8−9
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−3536%
|
800−850
+3536%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−3650%
|
300−310
+3650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−3650%
|
150−160
+3650%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−3567%
|
110−120
+3567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+62.5%
|
24−27
−62.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−3700%
|
190−200
+3700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−3536%
|
800−850
+3536%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+62.5%
|
24−27
−62.5%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
−3650%
|
300−310
+3650%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−3650%
|
75−80
+3650%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−3362%
|
450−500
+3362%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−3471%
|
500−550
+3471%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−3567%
|
550−600
+3567%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−3567%
|
110−120
+3567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−3567%
|
110−120
+3567%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−3650%
|
150−160
+3650%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 8800M GTX SLI is 900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 8800M GTX SLI is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (3%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.04 | 78.07 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
8800M GTX SLI has 92.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070, on the other hand, has a 3727% higher aggregate performance score, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
