GeForce RTX 5070 vs 8400M G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1420not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.05no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameG86GB205
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86400
Core clock speed400 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200504.0
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS32.26 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s120.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.19.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 220 Watt

8400M G has 2100% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070, on the other hand, has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M G and GeForce RTX 5070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 21 vote

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 87 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.