Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs GeForce 840M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 840M with Quadro T2000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 840M
2014
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
2.83

T2000 Max-Q outperforms 840M by a whopping 533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking787302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.9430.96
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM108TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed1029 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98103.7
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 840M 2.83
T2000 Max-Q 17.90
+533%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 840M 1091
T2000 Max-Q 6906
+533%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 840M 2340
T2000 Max-Q 11461
+390%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 840M 7191
T2000 Max-Q 39269
+446%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 840M 1573
T2000 Max-Q 8262
+425%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 840M 8724
T2000 Max-Q 41106
+371%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 840M 119888
+59.4%
T2000 Max-Q 75193

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GeForce 840M 7
T2000 Max-Q 51
+635%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GeForce 840M 5
T2000 Max-Q 97
+1704%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GeForce 840M 1
T2000 Max-Q 75
+5638%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GeForce 840M 9
T2000 Max-Q 91
+917%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GeForce 840M 18
T2000 Max-Q 89
+384%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GeForce 840M 2
T2000 Max-Q 32
+1683%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GeForce 840M 10
T2000 Max-Q 40
+295%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GeForce 840M 13
+87.3%
T2000 Max-Q 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GeForce 840M 10
T2000 Max-Q 40
+295%

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GeForce 840M 7
T2000 Max-Q 51
+635%

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GeForce 840M 9
T2000 Max-Q 91
+917%

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GeForce 840M 5
T2000 Max-Q 97
+1704%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GeForce 840M 1
T2000 Max-Q 75
+5631%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GeForce 840M 18
T2000 Max-Q 89
+383%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GeForce 840M 2
T2000 Max-Q 32
+1683%

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GeForce 840M 13.3
+87.3%
T2000 Max-Q 7.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
−522%
280−290
+522%
Full HD17
−235%
57
+235%
1440p4−5
−550%
26
+550%
4K6−7
−533%
38
+533%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−489%
53
+489%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%
Hitman 3 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−300%
85−90
+300%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2767%
86
+2767%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−814%
64
+814%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−392%
55−60
+392%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−500%
45−50
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%
Hitman 3 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−300%
85−90
+300%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−392%
55−60
+392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−178%
25
+178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−653%
110−120
+653%
Hitman 3 8−9
−325%
30−35
+325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−150%
55
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−392%
55−60
+392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−450%
33
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−126%
85−90
+126%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−571%
47
+571%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−414%
35−40
+414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−529%
100−110
+529%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how GeForce 840M and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is 522% faster in 900p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 235% faster in 1080p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 550% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 533% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Max-Q is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 17.90
Recency 12 March 2014 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce 840M has 21.2% lower power consumption.

T2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 532.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 840M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 840M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 840M
GeForce 840M
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 915 votes

Rate GeForce 840M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 67 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.