Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce 825M

Place in the ranking	880	21
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.87
Power efficiency	4.28	16.09
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GK208	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	27 January 2014 (10 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	5120
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	941 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	30.11	720.0
Floating-point processing power	0.7227 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	128
TMUs	32	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 825M 2.03

RX 6900 XT 69.44
+3321%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 825M 782

RX 6900 XT 26791
+3326%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 825M 1757

RX 6900 XT 59119
+3266%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 825M 1150

RX 6900 XT 50587
+4299%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	31 −529%	195 +529%
1440p	3−4 −4067%	125 +4067%
4K	2−3 −3850%	79 +3850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.12
1440p	no data	7.99
4K	no data	12.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−3275%

130−140
+3275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −1571%	117 +1571%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −22100%	220−230 +22100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2280%	110−120 +2280%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3275%	130−140 +3275%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3800%	110−120 +3800%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2875%	230−240 +2875%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1743%	120−130 +1743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −1306%	250−260 +1306%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2950%	120−130 +2950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2830%	290−300 +2830%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −322%	150−160 +322%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −3886%	279 +3886%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −22100%	220−230 +22100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2280%	110−120 +2280%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3275%	130−140 +3275%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3800%	110−120 +3800%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2875%	230−240 +2875%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1743%	120−130 +1743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −1306%	250−260 +1306%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2950%	120−130 +2950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2830%	290−300 +2830%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1142%	140−150 +1142%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −322%	150−160 +322%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −1300%	98 +1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2280%	110−120 +2280%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3275%	130−140 +3275%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3800%	110−120 +3800%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −3000%	248 +3000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1743%	120−130 +1743%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −1472%	283 +1472%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2830%	290−300 +2830%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1267%	164 +1267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −236%	121 +236%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2950%

120−130
+2950%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −5400%	160−170 +5400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3600%	110−120 +3600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −4850%	99 +4850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −8000%	80−85 +8000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −7300%	70−75 +7300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4000%	80−85 +4000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1343%	100−110 +1343%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −3633%	224 +3633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −12500%	120−130 +12500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −2073%	230−240 +2073%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−2180%

110−120
+2180%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−6800%

65−70
+6800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3300%	68 +3300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −6500%	66 +6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	50−55
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	54

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2400%

75−80
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 +0%	169 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	142 +0%	142 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

137

+0%

137

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +0%	109 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	117 +0%	117 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Hitman 3	83 +0%	83 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	122 +0%	122 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +0%	162 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

This is how GeForce 825M and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is 529% faster in 1080p
RX 6900 XT is 4067% faster in 1440p
RX 6900 XT is 3850% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 22100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.03	69.44
Recency	27 January 2014	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	300 Watt

GeForce 825M has 809.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6900 XT, on the other hand, has a 3320.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 825M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 825M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.