GeForce 825M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

GeForce 825M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 2.02% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce 825M sales 27 January 2014. This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1.8 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. Power consumption is at 33 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about GeForce 825M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking842
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.31
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK208
Market segmentLaptop
Release date27 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$160 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

GeForce 825M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 825M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed850 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed941 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors915 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate30.11of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance722.7 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 825M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 825M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width64 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1800 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 825M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce 825M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+

API compatibility

APIs supported by GeForce 825M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan1.1.126
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce 825M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 825M 2.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 825M 782

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 825M 1757

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 825M 6000

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 825M 1150

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 825M 7416

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce 825M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD35

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey no data
Battlefield 5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare no data
Cyberpunk 2077 no data
Far Cry 5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn no data
Forza Horizon 4 no data
Hitman 3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider no data
Watch Dogs: Legion no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey no data
Battlefield 5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare no data
Cyberpunk 2077 no data
Far Cry 5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn no data
Forza Horizon 4 no data
Hitman 3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt no data
Watch Dogs: Legion no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare no data
Cyberpunk 2077 no data
Far Cry 5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt no data
Watch Dogs: Legion no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare no data
Cyberpunk 2077 no data
Far Cry 5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 no data
Hitman 3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt no data
Watch Dogs: Legion no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 no data

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn no data
Horizon Zero Dawn no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare no data
Far Cry 5 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn no data
Metro Exodus no data
Watch Dogs: Legion no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 no data

Closest competitors

GeForce 825M's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook graphics cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce 825M is Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics, which is slower by 1% and lower by 5 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 825M:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 825M according to our statistics.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce 825M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce 825M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.