GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs 6600 LE

Place in the ranking	1430	131
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	21.95
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV43	TU104B
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	2005 (20 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2560
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	146 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	110 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.200	220.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	4	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	250 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	8 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	119
1440p	-0−1	75
4K	-0−1	45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Elden Ring	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	99 +0%	99 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	111 +0%	111 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +0%	119 +0%
Valorant	172 +0%	172 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	129 +0%	129 +0%
Elden Ring	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	84 +0%	84 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	129 +0%	129 +0%
Metro Exodus	85 +0%	85 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60 +0%	60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Valorant	113 +0%	113 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	83 +0%	83 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	124 +0%	124 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Valorant	163 +0%	163 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Elden Ring	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 +0%	38 +0%
World of Tanks	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	79 +0%	79 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	89 +0%	89 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	118 +0%	118 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	25 +0%	25 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	46 +0%	46 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Valorant	62 +0%	62 +0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.13	36.67
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	110 nm	12 nm

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 28107.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6600 LE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 6600 LE is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.