UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce 6200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 6200 with UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms 6200 by a whopping 4470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1452 | 656 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 11.24 |
Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | NV43 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 11 October 2004 (20 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
Number of transistors | 146 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 1.200 | no data |
ROPs | 2 | no data |
TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 190 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 275 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 8.8 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial) | no data |
OpenCL | N/A | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | -0−1 | 18 |
Cost per frame, $
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Fortnite | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.10 | 4.57 |
Recency | 11 October 2004 | 15 August 2020 |
Chip lithography | 110 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 4470% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6200 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 6200 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.