GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs 610M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.75

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms 610M by a whopping 2387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1155294
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiency4.3628.90
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF119GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed738 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90494.53
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 610M 0.75
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.65
+2387%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 610M 508
RTX 2050 Mobile 12340
+2332%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 610M 2210
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+2019%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%
1440p1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
4K1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−780%
44
+780%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−658%
90−95
+658%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 50−55
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−184%
85−90
+184%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−760%
43
+760%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−658%
90−95
+658%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 50−55
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−933%
62
+933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−184%
85−90
+184%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−740%
40−45
+740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1167%
35−40
+1167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Hitman 3 5−6
−680%
39
+680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−658%
90−95
+658%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−817%
55
+817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−230%
33
+230%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+72.2%
18
−72.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 50−55

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 35−40
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2100%
21−24
+2100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−214%
21−24
+214%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−5450%
110−120
+5450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 14−16

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 9−10
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GeForce 610M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 4200% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 3500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 3100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce 610M is 72% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 5450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 610M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 34 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 18.65
Recency 1 December 2011 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 45 Watt

GeForce 610M has 275% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2386.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 740 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2075 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.