Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ATI GameCube GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated822
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.29
ArchitectureRage 5 (2000)no data
GPU code nameFlipperno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 August 2000 (24 years ago)6 December 2018 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed162 MHzno data
Number of transistors51 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate0.65no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount16 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed162 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.296 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0+12
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2000 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GameCube GPU and Qualcomm Adreno 685. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI GameCube GPU
GameCube GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 31 vote

Rate GameCube GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.