GeForce MX570 vs GRID A100A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data41.32
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69122048
Core clock speed900 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate434.273.92
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs19240
TMUs43264
Tensor Cores43264
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB2 GB
Memory bus width6144 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.08.6

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 25 Watt

GRID A100A has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has 1500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and GeForce MX570. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 92 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.