Arc A730M vs GeForce MX570

Place in the ranking	362	211
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.94	23.50
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GA107	DG2-512
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	3072
Core clock speed	832 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	393.6
Floating-point processing power	4.731 TFLOPS	12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	96
TMUs	64	192
Tensor Cores	64	384
Ray Tracing Cores	16	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-
DLSS	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX570 14.26

Arc A730M 26.19
+83.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX570 5712

Arc A730M 10487
+83.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	38 −89.5%	72 +89.5%
1440p	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
4K	12−14 −100%	24 +100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −140%	60 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −145%	71 +145%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −70.8%	80−85 +70.8%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −152%	63 +152%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −10.3%	32 +10.3%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −197%	178 +197%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −53.8%	60 +53.8%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −105%	84 +105%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −61.1%	55−60 +61.1%
Valorant	60−65 −86.7%	112 +86.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −70.8%	80−85 +70.8%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −116%	54 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +7.4%	27 −7.4%
Dota 2	12 −550%	78 +550%
Far Cry 5	68 +74.4%	39 −74.4%
Fortnite	80−85 −60.2%	130−140 +60.2%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −148%	149 +148%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −84.6%	70−75 +84.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 −35.8%	72 +35.8%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −39%	57 +39%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −55.1%	160−170 +55.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −61.1%	55−60 +61.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −100%	90−95 +100%
Valorant	60−65 −20%	72 +20%
World of Tanks	190−200 −37.8%	260−270 +37.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −70.8%	80−85 +70.8%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +11.5%	26 −11.5%
Dota 2	50−55 −50.9%	80 +50.9%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −48.1%	80−85 +48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −107%	124 +107%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −20.5%	47 +20.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −55.1%	160−170 +55.1%
Valorant	60−65 −70%	102 +70%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −25.9%	170−180 +25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −92.3%	24−27 +92.3%
World of Tanks	100−110 −72.1%	170−180 +72.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −80%	50−55 +80%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −36.4%	15 +36.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −128%	80−85 +128%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −100%	70−75 +100%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −91.3%	40−45 +91.3%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −93.8%	60−65 +93.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −110%	40−45 +110%
Valorant	35−40 −91.9%	71 +91.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Dota 2	24−27 −30.8%	34 +30.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −30.8%	34 +30.8%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −110%	21 +110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −90.9%	80−85 +90.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −30.8%	34 +30.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Dota 2	24−27 −84.6%	45−50 +84.6%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −94.7%	35−40 +94.7%
Fortnite	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −157%	54 +157%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Valorant	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Arc A730M compete in popular games:

Arc A730M is 89% faster in 1080p
Arc A730M is 86% faster in 1440p
Arc A730M is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 74% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A730M is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
Arc A730M is ahead in 61 test (95%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.26	26.19
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	80 Watt

GeForce MX570 has 220% lower power consumption.

Arc A730M, on the other hand, has a 83.7% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A730M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.