GeForce FX 5900 Ultra vs GRID A100A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGA100NV35
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)23 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912no data
Core clock speed900 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHzno data
Number of transistors54,200 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt59 Watt
Texture fill rate434.23.600
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1924
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data218 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR
Maximum RAM amount48 GB256 MB
Memory bus width6144 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0a
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 59 Watt

GRID A100A has an age advantage of 16 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5900 Ultra, on the other hand, has 578% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and GeForce FX 5900 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.