Radeon RX 6550M vs A100 PCIe
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 211 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.95 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | GA100 | Navi 24 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 June 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6912 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2840 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 54,200 million | 5,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 609.1 | 181.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 19.49 TFLOPS | 5.816 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 160 | 32 |
| TMUs | 432 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 5120 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,555 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 June 2020 | 4 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 80 Watt |
A100 PCIe has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 6550M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A100 PCIe and Radeon RX 6550M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A100 PCIe is a workstation card while Radeon RX 6550M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
