UHD Graphics 750 vs FirePro W2100

Place in the ranking	843	658
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.23	20.72
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Oland	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 August 2014 (10 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	256
Core clock speed	630 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	680 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.60	20.80
Floating-point processing power	0.4352 TFLOPS	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	Ring Bus
Width	1-slot	IGP
Form factor	low profile / half length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort count	2	no data
Dual-link DVI support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34

UHD Graphics 750 4.49
+91.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W2100 903

UHD Graphics 750 1733
+91.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
4K	2 −50%	3−4 +50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−80%

9−10
+80%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −155%	27−30 +155%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −18.9%	40−45 +18.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −155%	27−30 +155%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −18.9%	40−45 +18.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −155%	27−30 +155%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −18.9%	40−45 +18.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−140%

12−14
+140%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −115%	27−30 +115%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−60%

8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

This is how FirePro W2100 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is 71% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 750 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 51 test (85%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (15%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.34	4.49
Recency	12 August 2014	30 March 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has a 91.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.