Radeon Pro W5300M vs FirePro S7150 x2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTongaNavi 14
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2016 (8 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Core clock speed920 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)265 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate103.0100.0
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2016 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 265 Watt 85 Watt

S7150 x2 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 211.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S7150 x2 and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7150 x2
FirePro S7150 x2
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M
Radeon Pro W5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.