FirePro S7150 x2 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking482not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.37no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 14Tonga
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081792
Core clock speed1000 MHz920 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt265 Watt
Texture fill rate127.6103.0
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS3.297 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs88112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 1 February 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 265 Watt

Pro W5500M has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 211.8% lower power consumption.

S7150 x2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5500M and FirePro S7150 x2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation card while FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
AMD FirePro S7150 x2
FirePro S7150 x2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.