Radeon Pro W5500M vs FirePro S7000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S7000 with Radeon Pro W5500M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S7000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
11.74
+30.4%

S7000 outperforms Pro W5500M by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking408484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Power efficiency5.377.26
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePitcairnNavi 14
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 August 2012 (12 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801408
Core clock speed950 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate76.00127.6
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS4.083 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8088

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length292 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro S7000 11.74
+30.4%
Pro W5500M 9.00

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S7000 4523
+30.4%
Pro W5500M 3469

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.74 9.00
Recency 27 August 2012 10 February 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 85 Watt

FirePro S7000 has a 30.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro W5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 311.8% lower power consumption.

The FirePro S7000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S7000 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S7000
FirePro S7000
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro S7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.