GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs FirePro S9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
FirePro D500 FirePro D700 FirePro S9000 FirePro S9010 FirePro S9050 FirePro S10000 FirePro S10000 Passive FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB FirePro W8000 FirePro W9000 Radeon Sky 700 Radeon Sky 900
VS
RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro S9000 with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro S9000
2012
6 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
11.32

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms S9000 by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking402135
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Power efficiency4.0051.30
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTahitiAD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 August 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922560
Core clock speed900 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8140.4
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro S9000 11.32
RTX 4050 Mobile 32.25
+185%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro S9000 5059
RTX 4050 Mobile 14413
+185%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−220%
96
+220%
1440p16−18
−213%
50
+213%
4K10−12
−200%
30
+200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p83.30no data
1440p156.19no data
4K249.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 132
+0%
132
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%
Atomic Heart 124
+0%
124
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Atomic Heart 72
+0%
72
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 169
+0%
169
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+0%
65
+0%
Dota 2 162
+0%
162
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80
+0%
80
+0%
Valorant 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+0%
64
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how FirePro S9000 and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 220% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 213% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.32 32.25
Recency 24 August 2012 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 4050 Mobile has a 184.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro S9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro S9000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro S9000
FirePro S9000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60 2Q
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
FirePro S9000 FirePro S9000
vs
FirePro S9050 FirePro S9050
FirePro D700 AMD FirePro D700
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
FirePro S7000 AMD FirePro S7000
vs
Pro V340 MxGPU Pro V340 MxGPU
FirePro S7000 AMD FirePro S7000
vs
Pro W5500M Pro W5500M
FirePro S9000 AMD FirePro S9000
vs
Pro W5500M Pro W5500M
FirePro S9000 AMD FirePro S9000
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
Quadro K500M Quadro K500M
FirePro W8000 AMD FirePro W8000
vs
A100 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
FirePro W7000 AMD FirePro W7000
vs
ATI Mobility 128 M3 Mobility 128 M3
FirePro W7000 AMD FirePro W7000
vs
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
FirePro W7000 AMD FirePro W7000
vs
P106-090 P106 090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7
7 votes

Rate FirePro S9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1
3095 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S9000 or GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.