UHD Graphics 710 vs ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.25
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR300Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed324 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors110 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.59210.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP Pro 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed276 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth17.66 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 710 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 146.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireGL 9700 X1-256p and UHD Graphics 710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p
FireGL 9700 X1-256p
Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 122 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.