ATI FirePro V4800 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTU116Redwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2020 (4 years ago)26 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896400
Core clock speed1410 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate89.0415.50
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPS0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2020 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 69 Watt

GTX 1650 TU116 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V4800, on the other hand, has 15.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is a desktop card while FirePro V4800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 81 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 55 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.