Radeon PRO V710 vs B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureBlackwell (2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGB100Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2024 (recently)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores168963456
Core clock speed1665 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1837 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors208,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)1000 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate969.9432.0
Floating-point processing power62.08 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs528216
Tensor Cores528no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthSXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount96 GB28 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.1 TB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA9.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 96 GB 28 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 1000 Watt 158 Watt

B200 SXM 192 GB has a 242.9% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has 532.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between B200 SXM 192 GB and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 31 vote

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.