Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce RTX 5090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGB202Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20253 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores217603456
Core clock speed2235 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2520 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology0 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate1,714432.0
Floating-point processing power109.7 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs19296
TMUs680216
Tensor Cores680no data
Ray Tracing Cores17054

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length304 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB28 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.52 TB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA10.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 28 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 158 Watt

RTX 5090 has a 14.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has 216.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 5090 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 325 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.