GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs Arc A730M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 200 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 62 |
| Architecture | Xe HPG (2022−2023) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Alchemist | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 18176 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 2565 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,700 million | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt (80 - 120 Watt TGP) | 600 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 | 1,457 |
| Floating-point performance | 6.758 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 336 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 24 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 1.15 TB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 600 Watt |
Arc A730M has 400% lower power consumption.
RTX 4090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Arc A730M and GeForce RTX 4090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 Ti is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
