Radeon RX 6550M vs Arc A350M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A350M and Radeon RX 6550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A350M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
14.56

RX 6550M outperforms Arc A350M by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking360218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.0921.57
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2840 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20181.8
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS5.816 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs4864
Ray Tracing Cores616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.56
RX 6550M 25.07
+72.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A350M 10730
RX 6550M 20506
+91.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A350M 7147
RX 6550M 14696
+106%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A350M 3050
RX 6550M 4546
+49%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−94.3%
68
+94.3%
1440p16
−50%
24
+50%
4K8
−50%
12−14
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−104%
53
+104%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
Elden Ring 22
−273%
80−85
+273%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−60.4%
75−80
+60.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−73.1%
45
+73.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−467%
50−55
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 66
−86.4%
123
+86.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−65%
65−70
+65%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Valorant 56
−80.4%
100−110
+80.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−60.4%
75−80
+60.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−34.6%
35
+34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−538%
50−55
+538%
Dota 2 38
−126%
85−90
+126%
Elden Ring 42
−95.2%
80−85
+95.2%
Far Cry 5 27
−22.2%
33
+22.2%
Fortnite 80−85
−53.7%
120−130
+53.7%
Forza Horizon 4 53
−90.6%
101
+90.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
−231%
85−90
+231%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−65%
65−70
+65%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−48.1%
150−160
+48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−80%
80−85
+80%
Valorant 55−60
−74.1%
100−110
+74.1%
World of Tanks 190−200
−35.1%
250−260
+35.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−60.4%
75−80
+60.4%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−11.5%
29
+11.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−750%
50−55
+750%
Dota 2 59
−45.8%
85−90
+45.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45
−95.6%
88
+95.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−48.1%
150−160
+48.1%
Valorant 55−60
−74.1%
100−110
+74.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10
−320%
40−45
+320%
Elden Ring 17
−159%
40−45
+159%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−320%
40−45
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−37.8%
170−180
+37.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
World of Tanks 100−110
−62.7%
160−170
+62.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−109%
70−75
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−81.1%
65−70
+81.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−78.1%
55−60
+78.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Valorant 35−40
−88.9%
65−70
+88.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Dota 2 11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Elden Ring 3
−567%
20−22
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−79.1%
75−80
+79.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−291%
40−45
+291%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−85.7%
24−27
+85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−130%
21−24
+130%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Dota 2 24−27
−69.2%
40−45
+69.2%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−83.3%
30−35
+83.3%
Fortnite 16−18
−82.4%
30−35
+82.4%
Forza Horizon 4 19
−100%
35−40
+100%
Valorant 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%

This is how Arc A350M and RX 6550M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6550M is 94% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6550M is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6550M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6550M is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6550M surpassed Arc A350M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.56 25.07
Recency 30 March 2022 4 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 80 Watt

Arc A350M has 220% lower power consumption.

RX 6550M, on the other hand, has a 72.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The Radeon RX 6550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Radeon RX 6550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 221 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.