Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Place in the ranking	373	355
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.81	40.78
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GP107	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	1152 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1417 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	68.02	55.20
Floating-point processing power	2.177 TFLOPS	1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	24
TMUs	48	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.88

Arc A350M 14.73
+6.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 8752

Arc A350M 10730
+22.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 29504

Arc A350M 31023
+5.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 7324
+2.5%

Arc A350M 7147

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 46952
+29.3%

Arc A350M 36315

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 2261

Arc A350M 3050
+34.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	54 +54.3%	35 −54.3%
1440p	32 +88.2%	17 −88.2%
4K	19 +111%	9 −111%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−22.7%

27
+22.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +30.3%	30−35 −30.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −59.1%	35 +59.1%
Battlefield 5	46 +0%	45−50 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +15.8%	19 −15.8%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −3.1%	30−35 +3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	48 +23.1%	35−40 −23.1%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Hitman 3	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80 +73.9%	45−50 −73.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −1.3%	75−80 +1.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 +84.8%	30−35 −84.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +10%	20 −10%
Battlefield 5	41 −12.2%	45−50 +12.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −3.1%	30−35 +3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	36 −8.3%	35−40 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −2.2%	90−95 +2.2%
Hitman 3	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −17.8%	53 +17.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −1.3%	75−80 +1.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 −83.3%	30−35 +83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +83.3%	12 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −3.1%	30−35 +3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	47 −97.9%	90−95 +97.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −1.4%	70−75 +1.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +0%	45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +31.6%	19 −31.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −1.3%	75−80 +1.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−2.6%

35−40
+2.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −3.7%	27−30 +3.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −27.3%	14 +27.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −2.8%	70−75 +2.8%
Hitman 3	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Metro Exodus	29 +16%	24−27 −16%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −54.2%	37 +54.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −2.3%	85−90 +2.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Hitman 3	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −4.4%	70−75 +4.4%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +6.7%	15 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	20 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −46.2%	19 +46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 54% faster in 1080p
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 88% faster in 1440p
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 111% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 85% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A350M is 98% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
Arc A350M is ahead in 45 tests (63%)
there's a draw in 13 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.88	14.73
Recency	3 January 2018	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	25 Watt

Arc A350M has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Arc A350M.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.