GeForce MX570 A vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU with GeForce MX570 A, including specs and performance data.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
17.53
+12.8%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms MX570 A by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking308343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1155 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.92
Floating-point performanceno data4.731 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
1440p16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+14%
100−105
−14%
Hitman 3 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+14%
100−105
−14%
Hitman 3 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Far Cry 5 33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+14%
100−105
−14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Hitman 3 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+16.5%
85−90
−16.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+14.7%
95−100
−14.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+16.3%
80−85
−16.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and MX570 A compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 14% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.53 15.54
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

Arc 8-Cores iGPU has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 A in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook card while GeForce MX570 A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A
GeForce MX570 A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 59 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 44 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.