Arc Graphics 140V vs Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 7-Cores iGPU and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 318 | 385 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Xe² (2024) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 34
−17.6%
| 40
+17.6%
|
| 1440p | 24−27
+20%
| 20
−20%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+29.6%
|
27−30
−29.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 38
+40.7%
|
27−30
−40.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+29.4%
|
85−90
−29.4%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24−27
−37.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 85−90
+32.3%
|
65−70
−32.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
+30.8%
|
65−70
−30.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+29.6%
|
27−30
−29.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+29.4%
|
85−90
−29.4%
|
| Hitman 3 | 30−35
+37.5%
|
24−27
−37.5%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 85−90
+32.3%
|
65−70
−32.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65
+33.3%
|
45−50
−33.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 52
+30%
|
40−45
−30%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
+30.8%
|
65−70
−30.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40
+30%
|
30−33
−30%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+42.5%
|
40−45
−42.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35
+29.6%
|
27−30
−29.6%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 45−50
+34.3%
|
35−40
−34.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+29.4%
|
85−90
−29.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
+37.5%
|
16−18
−37.5%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90
+30.8%
|
65−70
−30.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
+31.3%
|
16−18
−31.3%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
+29.6%
|
27−30
−29.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+33.3%
|
24−27
−33.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+50%
|
18−20
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+34.3%
|
70−75
−34.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 100−110
+31.3%
|
80−85
−31.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 85−90
+36.9%
|
65−70
−36.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12−14
−41.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+41.7%
|
12−14
−41.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+33.3%
|
18−20
−33.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
This is how Arc 7-Cores iGPU and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 140V is 18% faster in 1080p
- Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 20% faster in 1440p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.18 | 13.29 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 29.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
