Arc A770M vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and Arc A770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.71

Arc A770M outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.74
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameno dataDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84096
Core clock speed1278 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data524.8
Floating-point processing powerno data16.79 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−252%
95
+252%
1440p21−24
−157%
54
+157%
4K16−18
−144%
39
+144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−319%
113
+319%
Elden Ring 40−45
−51.2%
62
+51.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−77.8%
48
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−365%
256
+365%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−170%
100
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−88.2%
60−65
+88.2%
Valorant 50−55
−128%
120−130
+128%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−44.4%
39
+44.4%
Dota 2 45−50
−18.4%
58
+18.4%
Elden Ring 40−45
−156%
100−110
+156%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−7.7%
56
+7.7%
Fortnite 75−80
−89.6%
140−150
+89.6%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−284%
211
+284%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−75.5%
86
+75.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−122%
82
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−79%
170−180
+79%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−88.2%
60−65
+88.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−148%
100−110
+148%
Valorant 50−55
−128%
120−130
+128%
World of Tanks 180−190
−51.1%
270−280
+51.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−100%
90−95
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−22.2%
33
+22.2%
Dota 2 45−50
−108%
100−110
+108%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−65.4%
85−90
+65.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−225%
179
+225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−79%
170−180
+79%
Valorant 50−55
−128%
120−130
+128%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
−184%
50−55
+184%
Elden Ring 21−24
−176%
55−60
+176%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−60.6%
170−180
+60.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−142%
27−30
+142%
World of Tanks 95−100
−106%
200−210
+106%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−126%
60−65
+126%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−133%
27−30
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−120%
22
+120%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−200%
95−100
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−138%
65−70
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Valorant 30−35
−162%
85−90
+162%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Dota 2 24−27
−87.5%
45
+87.5%
Elden Ring 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−87.5%
45
+87.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−311%
37
+311%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−143%
95−100
+143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−87.5%
45
+87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−162%
30−35
+162%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
Dota 2 24−27
−133%
55−60
+133%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−153%
40−45
+153%
Fortnite 14−16
−173%
40−45
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−289%
74
+289%
Valorant 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 252% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 157% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 144% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A770M is 365% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A770M surpassed Apple M1 8-Core GPU in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.71 30.92
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 125.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 923 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 90 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.