ATI FireGL V7300 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRV250R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors36 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data97 Watt
Texture fill rate1.1009.504
ROPs416
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed225 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.42.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2003 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 90 nm

ATI FireGL V7300 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO is a desktop card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
ATI FireGL V7300
FireGL V7300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.