Radeon RX 5700M vs ATI 9200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1522not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.02no data
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRV280Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2003 (21 year ago)1 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed250 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1720 MHz
Number of transistors36 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000247.7
Floating-point processing powerno data7.926 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 1 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 180 Watt

ATI 9200 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5700M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon 9200 and Radeon RX 5700M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon 9200 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 5700M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon 9200
Radeon 9200
AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 50 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.