Arc Pro A60 vs A10G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared A10G and Arc Pro A60, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
A10G outperforms Arc Pro A60 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 72 | 243 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 22.21 | 12.73 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | GA102 | DG2-256 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 6 June 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 9216 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 28,300 million | 11,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 492.5 | 262.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 31.52 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 64 |
| TMUs | 288 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1563 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 600.2 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | - |
| DLSS | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 41.87 | 20.80 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 6 June 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
A10G has a 101.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.
The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Pro A60 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
