EPYC 7643 vs Xeon W3503

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3503
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.73
EPYC 7643
2021
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
49.69
+6707%

EPYC 7643 outperforms Xeon W3503 by a whopping 6707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking269738
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.156.32
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.5120.14
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$4,995

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7643 has 52% better value for money than Xeon W3503.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)3 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)24 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size263 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors731 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.8V-1.225Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1366SP3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size24 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3503 0.73
EPYC 7643 49.69
+6707%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3503 1118
EPYC 7643 76050
+6702%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 49.69
Recency 30 March 2009 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon W3503 has 73.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7643, on the other hand, has a 6706.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7643 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3503 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3503 and EPYC 7643, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3503
Xeon W3503
AMD EPYC 7643
EPYC 7643

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon W3503 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 232 votes

Rate EPYC 7643 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3503 or EPYC 7643, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.