Xeon Phi 5120D vs MP 3.50
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Cranford (2005) | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 17 June 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 60 (Hexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 240 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 350 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 604 | SFF 230-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 245 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 60 |
| Threads | 1 | 240 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 245 Watt |
Xeon MP 3.50 has 81.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 5120D, on the other hand, has 5900% more physical cores and 23900% more threads, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.50 and Xeon Phi 5120D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
