Core i5-12500H vs Xeon W-3235
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3235 outperforms i5-12500H by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 377 | 516 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 36 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.14 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | Intel Alder Lake-P |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
| Release date | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,398 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 10 MB |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB | 18 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P | BGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W-3235 outperforms Core i5-12500H by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon W-3235 outperforms Core i5-12500H by 20% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.50 | 13.72 |
| Recency | 3 June 2019 | 4 January 2022 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon W-3235 has a 20.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more threads.
i5-12500H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
The Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-12500H in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-12500H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and Core i5-12500H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
