Core i7-13700K vs Core i9-7940X
Aggregate performance score
i7-13700K outperforms i9-7940X by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 363 | 132 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.78 | 66.87 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i9 | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont |
| Release date | 30 May 2017 (7 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | $409 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-13700K has 2305% better value for money than i9-7940X.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 16 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 896 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 14 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 19.25 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 2066 | LGA 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 125 W, 253 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | 89.604 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 44 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i9-7940X by 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i9-7940X by 79% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i9-7940X by 107% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i9-7940X by 77% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.82 | 30.07 |
| Recency | 30 May 2017 | 27 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 16 |
| Threads | 28 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 125 Watt |
i9-7940X has 16.7% more threads.
i7-13700K, on the other hand, has a 78.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 14.3% more physical cores, and 32% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-13700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-7940X in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-7940X and Core i7-13700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
