Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Xeon Platinum 8462Y
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 537 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
Release date | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
Threads | 64 | 10 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 7.3 MB |
L2 cache | no data | 36 MB |
L3 cache | 60 MB | 24 MB |
Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FCLGA4677 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3696 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core.
PCIe version | 5 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 80 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 32 | 10 |
Threads | 64 | 10 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 2424 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8462Y has 220% more physical cores and 540% more threads, and 708% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8462Y is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8462Y and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.