Xeon Platinum 8462Y vs Apple M1
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1190 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 8-Core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 1 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 32 |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
Xeon Platinum 8462Y has an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M1 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8462Y is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and Xeon Platinum 8462Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
